2,3-Difluorobenzonitrile | CAS:21524-39-0

We serve 2,3-Difluorobenzonitrile CAS:21524-39-0 to global customers since 2007, Pls send inquiry to info@nbinno.com or visit www.nbinno.com our official website should you have any interests. This site is for information only.
2,3-Difluorobenzonitrile

Chemical Name:2,3-Difluorobenzonitrile
CAS.NO:21524-39-0
Synonyms:2,3-Difluorobenzonitrile
 
Physical and Chemical Properties:
Density 1.3±0.1 g/cm3
Boiling Point 181.5±20.0 °C at 760 mmHg
Molecular Formula C7H3F2N
Molecular Weight 139.102
Flash Point 75.0±0.0 °C
Vapour Pressure 0.8±0.3 mmHg at 25°C
Index of Refraction 1.486
 
Specification:
Appearance:Light yellow liquid
Assay:≥98.0%
 
Packing:200 kg/drum, can also be packaged according to customer requirements
Storage:Store in a cool, ventilated place
Application:Intermediate of Organic synthesis.



Contact us for information like 2,3-Difluorobenzonitrile chemical properties,Structure,melting point,boiling point,density,molecular formula,molecular weight,2,3-Difluorobenzonitrile physical properties,toxicity information,customs codes,safety, risk, hazard and MSDS, CAS,cas number,2,3-Difluorobenzonitrile Use and application,2,3-Difluorobenzonitrile technical grade,usp/ep/jp grade.


Related News: The drug review center will establish a registration platform and database for APIs, pharmaceutical excipients and pharmaceutical packaging materials, which means that the domestic drug substance DMF system is expected to be gradually implemented.Triethoxy(3-glycidyloxypropyl)silane manufacturer Russia, which shares a 2,600-mile border with China, reported its first two coronavirus cases on Friday.3,4,5,6-Tetrahydrophthalic anhydride supplier Russia, which shares a 2,600-mile border with China, reported its first two coronavirus cases on Friday.3,5-Dibromo-2-methoxypyridine vendor In these situations, the API is not a single substance but the culmination of various ingredients.What remains unknown is how exactly this nCoV came about and how easily it could spread, with researchers at Imperial College London suggesting on 20 January there could have been more than 1,700 cases in Wuhan alone by that point, when Chinese authorities were reporting just 62.