We serve Chemical Name:4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine hydrate CAS:175278-59-8 to global customers since 2007, Pls send inquiry to info@nbinno.com or visit www.nbinno.com our official website should you have any interests. This site is for information only.
Chemical Name:4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine hydrate
CAS.NO:175278-59-8
Synonyms:2-amino-4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazine hydrate
Molecular Formula:C5H10N4O
Molecular Weight:142.15900
HS Code:2933699090
Physical and Chemical Properties:
Melting point:168-170ºC
Boiling point:356.5ºC at 760mmHg
Density:N/A
Index of Refraction:
PSA:73.92000
Exact Mass:142.08500
LogP:0.58750
Material Safety Information (Applicable for Hazard Chemicals)
RIDADR:
Packing Group:
Contact us for information like 2-amino-4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazine hydrate chemical properties,Structure,melting point,boiling point,density,molecular formula,molecular weight,2-amino-4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazine hydrate physical properties,toxicity information,customs codes,safety, risk, hazard and MSDS, CAS,cas number,2-amino-4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazine hydrate Use and application,2-amino-4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazine hydrate technical grade,usp/ep/jp grade.
Related News: In the early stage of market development, API companies usually need to strive to become a supply company for pharmaceutical companies after quickly completing product preparations. In the subsequent scale-up of production and market application, the relationship between pharmaceutical companies and API companies will become closer. The choice of R & D products of pharmaceutical companies will also be affected by pharmaceutical companies in turn. 4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine hydrate manufacturer After several years of R & D and improvement, the production process of commonly used generic drug bulk drugs is relatively mature, and the products of similar companies have high similarities. Therefore, the competitive advantage of bulk drug companies is mainly reflected in cost control. Companies with cost advantages can usually pass Competition to expand production capacity and further gain scale advantages, while having stable, high-quality upstream supply. 4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine hydrate supplier The U.S. laws governing cosmetics safety and labelling date back to 1938 and 1967, which tells you something,” Bruton said.
However, on Tuesday, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) introduced the No PFAS in Cosmetics Act in the Senate, the Washington Post reported. The same bill was introduced in the U.S. House by Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Michigan). It would direct the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to issue a proposed rule banning the intentional addition of PFAS in cosmetics within 270 days of the bill’s passage, and require a final rule to be issued 90 days later.
“Our bill would require the FDA to ban the addition of PFAS to cosmetics products,” Collins said in a statement. “Americans should be able to trust that the products they are applying to their hair or skin are safe. 4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine hydrate vendor At the same time, because the profits of a single variety of characteristic APIs do not have long-term growth, companies need more product reserves. 4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine hydrate factory The U.S. laws governing cosmetics safety and labelling date back to 1938 and 1967, which tells you something,” Bruton said.
However, on Tuesday, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) introduced the No PFAS in Cosmetics Act in the Senate, the Washington Post reported. The same bill was introduced in the U.S. House by Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Michigan). It would direct the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to issue a proposed rule banning the intentional addition of PFAS in cosmetics within 270 days of the bill’s passage, and require a final rule to be issued 90 days later.
“Our bill would require the FDA to ban the addition of PFAS to cosmetics products,” Collins said in a statement. “Americans should be able to trust that the products they are applying to their hair or skin are safe.
However, on Tuesday, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) introduced the No PFAS in Cosmetics Act in the Senate, the Washington Post reported. The same bill was introduced in the U.S. House by Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Michigan). It would direct the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to issue a proposed rule banning the intentional addition of PFAS in cosmetics within 270 days of the bill’s passage, and require a final rule to be issued 90 days later.
“Our bill would require the FDA to ban the addition of PFAS to cosmetics products,” Collins said in a statement. “Americans should be able to trust that the products they are applying to their hair or skin are safe. 4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine hydrate vendor At the same time, because the profits of a single variety of characteristic APIs do not have long-term growth, companies need more product reserves. 4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine hydrate factory The U.S. laws governing cosmetics safety and labelling date back to 1938 and 1967, which tells you something,” Bruton said.
However, on Tuesday, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) introduced the No PFAS in Cosmetics Act in the Senate, the Washington Post reported. The same bill was introduced in the U.S. House by Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Michigan). It would direct the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to issue a proposed rule banning the intentional addition of PFAS in cosmetics within 270 days of the bill’s passage, and require a final rule to be issued 90 days later.
“Our bill would require the FDA to ban the addition of PFAS to cosmetics products,” Collins said in a statement. “Americans should be able to trust that the products they are applying to their hair or skin are safe.
