We serve Chemical Name:2,5-diamino-3-picoline, CAS:106070-58-0 to global customers since 2007, Pls send inquiry to info@nbinno.com or visit www.nbinno.com our official website should you have any interests. This site is for information only.
Chemical Name:2,5-diamino-3-picoline,
CAS.NO:106070-58-0
Synonyms:QC-9452;2,5-Diamino-3-picoline
Molecular Formula:C6H9N3
Molecular Weight:123.15600
HS Code:2933399090
Physical and Chemical Properties:
Melting point:N/A
Boiling point:329.2ºC at 760mmHg
Density:1.0161 (rough estimate)
Index of Refraction:1.4690 (estimate)
PSA:64.93000
Exact Mass:123.08000
LogP:1.71680
Material Safety Information (Applicable for Hazard Chemicals)
RIDADR:
Packing Group:
Contact us for information like QC-9452 chemical properties,Structure,melting point,boiling point,density,molecular formula,molecular weight,2,5-Diamino-3-picoline physical properties,toxicity information,customs codes,safety, risk, hazard and MSDS, CAS,cas number,2,5-Diamino-3-picoline Use and application,QC-9452 technical grade,usp/ep/jp grade.
Related News: The company memo said Lilly couldn’t substantiate allegations that employees faced retaliation for refusing to make false statements. It did not address employees’ specific complaints that they faced retaliation for other reasons, other than to say it encouraged employees to “speak up.” 2,5-diamino-3-picoline, manufacturer The company memo said Lilly couldn’t substantiate allegations that employees faced retaliation for refusing to make false statements. It did not address employees’ specific complaints that they faced retaliation for other reasons, other than to say it encouraged employees to “speak up.” 2,5-diamino-3-picoline, supplier GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is at the bottom of the top 20 list with the lowest percentage R&D spend/annual revenue at 12%.�� 2,5-diamino-3-picoline, vendor The company memo said Lilly couldn’t substantiate allegations that employees faced retaliation for refusing to make false statements. It did not address employees’ specific complaints that they faced retaliation for other reasons, other than to say it encouraged employees to “speak up.” 2,5-diamino-3-picoline, factory The company memo said Lilly couldn’t substantiate allegations that employees faced retaliation for refusing to make false statements. It did not address employees’ specific complaints that they faced retaliation for other reasons, other than to say it encouraged employees to “speak up.”
