Cas:142451-48-7 Lobetyolinin manufacturer & supplier

We serve Chemical Name:Lobetyolinin CAS:142451-48-7 to global customers since 2007, Pls send inquiry to info@nbinno.com or visit www.nbinno.com our official website should you have any interests. This site is for information only.

Lobetyolinin

Chemical Name:Lobetyolinin
CAS.NO:142451-48-7
Synonyms:1,7-dihydroxytetradeca-4,12-diene-8,10-diyn-6-yl 6-O-hexopyranosylhexopyranoside;Lobetyolinin
Molecular Formula:C26H38O13
Molecular Weight:558.57200
HS Code:

Physical and Chemical Properties:
Melting point:N/A
Boiling point:891.7ºC at 760mmHg
Density:1.48g/cm3
Index of Refraction:1.633
PSA:218.99000
Exact Mass:558.23100
LogP:

Material Safety Information (Applicable for Hazard Chemicals)
RIDADR:
Packing Group:


Contact us for information like 1,7-dihydroxytetradeca-4,12-diene-8,10-diyn-6-yl 6-O-hexopyranosylhexopyranoside chemical properties,Structure,melting point,boiling point,density,molecular formula,molecular weight,Lobetyolinin physical properties,toxicity information,customs codes,safety, risk, hazard and MSDS, CAS,cas number,Lobetyolinin Use and application,1,7-dihydroxytetradeca-4,12-diene-8,10-diyn-6-yl 6-O-hexopyranosylhexopyranoside technical grade,usp/ep/jp grade.


Related News: There are however certain APIs that are unknown and so require additional substances that work in conjunction with the API to produce the required effect. Lobetyolinin manufacturer China considers self-ruled Taiwan to be part of its territory and has long sought to limit its diplomatic relations and recognition at international bodies such as the W.H.O. Lobetyolinin supplier There are however certain APIs that are unknown and so require additional substances that work in conjunction with the API to produce the required effect. Lobetyolinin vendor Complete the research and development of APIs and intermediates, design new patented process routes, and explore new crystal forms. Lobetyolinin factory A November 2020 analysis by researchers at the University of Oxford found Innova’s tests could be more or less accurate depending on who was using them—ranging from lab scientists to trained healthcare professionals to the general public—but determined the tests overall had a low failure rate and high specificity, despite some variations seen in production batches. Still, Innova’s test and antigen diagnostics more broadly have been seen as less accurate compared to gold-standard, lab-based PCR screening.