We serve Chemical Name:Pyanchor CAS:168088-61-7 to global customers since 2007, Pls send inquiry to info@nbinno.com or visit www.nbinno.com our official website should you have any interests. This site is for information only.
Chemical Name:Pyanchor
CAS.NO:168088-61-7
Synonyms:Benzophenone O-[2,6-bis(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yloxy)benzoyl]oxime;Methanone, [2,6-bis[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)oxy]phenyl][[(diphenylmethylene)amino]oxy]-;{2,6-bis[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)oxy]phenyl}{[(diphenylmethylidene)amino]oxy}methanone;Pyribenzoxim;{2,6-Bis[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)oxy]phenyl}{[(diphenylmethylene)amino]oxy}methanone;{2,6-Bis[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)oxy]phenyl}{[(diphenylmethylen)amino]oxy}methanon;{2,6-Bis[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)oxy]phenyl}{[(diphenylmethylene)amino]oxy}methanone;Diphenylmethanone O-[2,6-bis[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)oxy]benzoyl]oxime;Pyanchor;N-({2,6-bis[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)oxy]benzoyl}oxy)-1,1-diphenylmethanimine;Benzophenone O-(2,6-bis((4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)oxy)benzoyl) oxime;(benzhydrylideneamino) 2,6-bis[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)oxy]benzoate
Molecular Formula:C32H27N5O8
Molecular Weight:609.586
HS Code:2933599012
Physical and Chemical Properties:
Melting point:N/A
Boiling point:810.8±75.0 °C at 760 mmHg
Density:1.3±0.1 g/cm3
Index of Refraction:1.613
PSA:145.60000
Exact Mass:609.185974
LogP:5.84
Material Safety Information (Applicable for Hazard Chemicals)
RIDADR:NONH for all modes of transpor
Packing Group:
Contact us for information like Benzophenone O-[2,6-bis(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yloxy)benzoyl]oxime chemical properties,Structure,melting point,boiling point,density,molecular formula,molecular weight,(benzhydrylideneamino) 2,6-bis[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)oxy]benzoate physical properties,toxicity information,customs codes,safety, risk, hazard and MSDS, CAS,cas number,Benzophenone O-[2,6-bis(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yloxy)benzoyl]oxime Use and application,Diphenylmethanone O-[2,6-bis[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)oxy]benzoyl]oxime technical grade,usp/ep/jp grade.
Related News: We found over half the products we tested contained elevated fluorine levels,” Bruton said.
The cosmetic categories that had the highest percentage of 213 high fluorine products were foundations (63%), eye products (58%), mascaras (47%), and lip products (55%), the study found.
Even more concerning was that cosmetics containing high levels of fluorine more often than not failed to disclose any PFAS chemicals on their labels, Bruton noted.
Further analysis of 29 cosmetics with high fluorine levels revealed that they contained between four and 13 specific PFAS chemicals, researchers found. However, only 1 of the 29 products listed PFAS as an ingredient on the product label.
“Even if a consumer is doing their due diligence and trying to avoid harmful chemicals by reading labels, our work is showing that these harmful chemicals are often not disclosed,” Bruton said.
Despite this, Bruton recommends that consumers who want to limit their exposure to PFAS read the labels anyway, to at least avoid products where the chemicals are accurately listed.
High levels of fluorine were frequently found in products advertised as “long-lasting” and “wear-resistant,” which could provide another clue for discerning consumers.
But in the end, there’s not much consumers can do to solve the problem.
“It’s important that the government step up to regulate ingredients in cosmetics with more stringency,” Bruton said. “It’s also time the cosmetics industry steps up and begins efforts to move away from this class of chemicals. Pyanchor manufacturer In April 2019, Glenmark had received approval from the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) for Remogliflozin Etabonate after successfully completing Phase-3 clinical trials. Pyanchor supplier In April 2019, Glenmark had received approval from the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) for Remogliflozin Etabonate after successfully completing Phase-3 clinical trials. Pyanchor vendor Because API companies usually adopt a different synthetic route from the original research company, compared with the drug itself, the impurities contained in the generic drug API have not been verified by the original drug for many years of use and require more careful testing and control. Pyanchor factory We found over half the products we tested contained elevated fluorine levels,” Bruton said.
The cosmetic categories that had the highest percentage of 213 high fluorine products were foundations (63%), eye products (58%), mascaras (47%), and lip products (55%), the study found.
Even more concerning was that cosmetics containing high levels of fluorine more often than not failed to disclose any PFAS chemicals on their labels, Bruton noted.
Further analysis of 29 cosmetics with high fluorine levels revealed that they contained between four and 13 specific PFAS chemicals, researchers found. However, only 1 of the 29 products listed PFAS as an ingredient on the product label.
“Even if a consumer is doing their due diligence and trying to avoid harmful chemicals by reading labels, our work is showing that these harmful chemicals are often not disclosed,” Bruton said.
Despite this, Bruton recommends that consumers who want to limit their exposure to PFAS read the labels anyway, to at least avoid products where the chemicals are accurately listed.
High levels of fluorine were frequently found in products advertised as “long-lasting” and “wear-resistant,” which could provide another clue for discerning consumers.
But in the end, there’s not much consumers can do to solve the problem.
“It’s important that the government step up to regulate ingredients in cosmetics with more stringency,” Bruton said. “It’s also time the cosmetics industry steps up and begins efforts to move away from this class of chemicals.
The cosmetic categories that had the highest percentage of 213 high fluorine products were foundations (63%), eye products (58%), mascaras (47%), and lip products (55%), the study found.
Even more concerning was that cosmetics containing high levels of fluorine more often than not failed to disclose any PFAS chemicals on their labels, Bruton noted.
Further analysis of 29 cosmetics with high fluorine levels revealed that they contained between four and 13 specific PFAS chemicals, researchers found. However, only 1 of the 29 products listed PFAS as an ingredient on the product label.
“Even if a consumer is doing their due diligence and trying to avoid harmful chemicals by reading labels, our work is showing that these harmful chemicals are often not disclosed,” Bruton said.
Despite this, Bruton recommends that consumers who want to limit their exposure to PFAS read the labels anyway, to at least avoid products where the chemicals are accurately listed.
High levels of fluorine were frequently found in products advertised as “long-lasting” and “wear-resistant,” which could provide another clue for discerning consumers.
But in the end, there’s not much consumers can do to solve the problem.
“It’s important that the government step up to regulate ingredients in cosmetics with more stringency,” Bruton said. “It’s also time the cosmetics industry steps up and begins efforts to move away from this class of chemicals. Pyanchor manufacturer In April 2019, Glenmark had received approval from the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) for Remogliflozin Etabonate after successfully completing Phase-3 clinical trials. Pyanchor supplier In April 2019, Glenmark had received approval from the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) for Remogliflozin Etabonate after successfully completing Phase-3 clinical trials. Pyanchor vendor Because API companies usually adopt a different synthetic route from the original research company, compared with the drug itself, the impurities contained in the generic drug API have not been verified by the original drug for many years of use and require more careful testing and control. Pyanchor factory We found over half the products we tested contained elevated fluorine levels,” Bruton said.
The cosmetic categories that had the highest percentage of 213 high fluorine products were foundations (63%), eye products (58%), mascaras (47%), and lip products (55%), the study found.
Even more concerning was that cosmetics containing high levels of fluorine more often than not failed to disclose any PFAS chemicals on their labels, Bruton noted.
Further analysis of 29 cosmetics with high fluorine levels revealed that they contained between four and 13 specific PFAS chemicals, researchers found. However, only 1 of the 29 products listed PFAS as an ingredient on the product label.
“Even if a consumer is doing their due diligence and trying to avoid harmful chemicals by reading labels, our work is showing that these harmful chemicals are often not disclosed,” Bruton said.
Despite this, Bruton recommends that consumers who want to limit their exposure to PFAS read the labels anyway, to at least avoid products where the chemicals are accurately listed.
High levels of fluorine were frequently found in products advertised as “long-lasting” and “wear-resistant,” which could provide another clue for discerning consumers.
But in the end, there’s not much consumers can do to solve the problem.
“It’s important that the government step up to regulate ingredients in cosmetics with more stringency,” Bruton said. “It’s also time the cosmetics industry steps up and begins efforts to move away from this class of chemicals.
