We serve Chemical Name:cyclopropyl-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)methanone CAS:71172-44-6 to global customers since 2007, Pls send inquiry to info@nbinno.com or visit www.nbinno.com our official website should you have any interests. This site is for information only.
Chemical Name:cyclopropyl-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)methanone
CAS.NO:71172-44-6
Synonyms:CYCLOPROPYL 2,5-DIMETHYLPHENYL KETONE;Cyclopropyl-<2,5-dimethyl-phenyl>-keton;cyclopropyl 2,5-xylyl ketone
Molecular Formula:C12H14O
Molecular Weight:174.23900
HS Code:2914399090
Physical and Chemical Properties:
Melting point:N/A
Boiling point:N/A
Density:N/A
Index of Refraction:
PSA:17.07000
Exact Mass:174.10400
LogP:2.89610
Material Safety Information (Applicable for Hazard Chemicals)
RIDADR:
Packing Group:
Contact us for information like CYCLOPROPYL 2,5-DIMETHYLPHENYL KETONE chemical properties,Structure,melting point,boiling point,density,molecular formula,molecular weight,cyclopropyl 2,5-xylyl ketone physical properties,toxicity information,customs codes,safety, risk, hazard and MSDS, CAS,cas number,Cyclopropyl-< Use and application,cyclopropyl 2,5-xylyl ketone technical grade,usp/ep/jp grade.
Related News: The American Heart Association explains that metabolic syndrome — a grouping of five different conditions — elevates the risk for such illnesses. Abdominal obesity is one such condition; the other four include high blood sugar, high triglycerides, high blood pressure and low levels of good” HDL cholesterol.
Bariatric surgery — including sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass — offers an opportunity to reduce such risk by helping patients achieve considerable weight loss, the investigators said.
In fact, the study team noted that bariatric surgery is the standard of care for severely obese patients. Severe obesity is defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of 40, or a BMI of 35 and up alongside obesity-related complications such as diabetes.
Using insurance claims data, Schimpke and his team focused on a pool of nearly 1.8 million patients across the United States who were severely obese — and therefore eligible for bariatric surgery — in the decade beginning 2010.
Of those, roughly 100,000 actually underwent bariatric surgery during that time frame. But procedure patterns varied widely by state.
For example, while between roughly 9% and 10.4% of eligible patients in New Jersey, Rhode Island and Delaware opted for surgery, less than 3% did so in West Virginia, Alabama and Arkansas.
Overall, the researchers determined that the lowest in opt-in rates by region was the Midwest, where just over 4% of eligible patients underwent surgery, despite the fact that nearly 34% of Midwesterners are obese (making the region home to the highest overall obesity rates in the country).
By contrast, the highest opt-in surgery rate (nearly 8%) was seen in the Northeast region, where the overall obesity rate is lower (29%).
The findings were presented last week at a virtual meeting of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Such research is considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
“There are likely several contributing factors to the wide variation in utilization,” said Schimpke. He highlighted differences in: levels of access to medical care; beliefs and attitudes among patients and referring physicians; number of available hospitals and surgeons; and insurance coverage requirements.
Schimpke also pointed to the “negative psycho-social connotation associated with bariatric surgery among both physicians/practitioners and patients, which needs to be addressed with strategic campaigns detailing the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery. cyclopropyl-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)methanone manufacturer This dosage form may also support combination therapy modalities.? To date, over 400 patients have been dosed with the oral formulation of rigosertib in clinical trials.? Combination therapy of oral rigosertib with azacitidine, the standard of care in HR-MDS, has also been studied. Currently, oral rigosertib is being developed as a combination therapy together with azacitidine for patients with higher-risk MDS who require HMA therapy.? cyclopropyl-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)methanone supplier It is foreseeable that in the future, the capacity and output of bulk APIs in China will decrease, the supply-demand relationship will be balanced, and prices and profits will gradually return to a more reasonable range. The era of low prices in the past will be gone forever. Individual APIs Varieties may even lose their price competitive advantage and move abroad. cyclopropyl-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)methanone vendor This dosage form may also support combination therapy modalities.? To date, over 400 patients have been dosed with the oral formulation of rigosertib in clinical trials.? Combination therapy of oral rigosertib with azacitidine, the standard of care in HR-MDS, has also been studied. Currently, oral rigosertib is being developed as a combination therapy together with azacitidine for patients with higher-risk MDS who require HMA therapy.? cyclopropyl-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)methanone factory The American Heart Association explains that metabolic syndrome — a grouping of five different conditions — elevates the risk for such illnesses. Abdominal obesity is one such condition; the other four include high blood sugar, high triglycerides, high blood pressure and low levels of good” HDL cholesterol.
Bariatric surgery — including sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass — offers an opportunity to reduce such risk by helping patients achieve considerable weight loss, the investigators said.
In fact, the study team noted that bariatric surgery is the standard of care for severely obese patients. Severe obesity is defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of 40, or a BMI of 35 and up alongside obesity-related complications such as diabetes.
Using insurance claims data, Schimpke and his team focused on a pool of nearly 1.8 million patients across the United States who were severely obese — and therefore eligible for bariatric surgery — in the decade beginning 2010.
Of those, roughly 100,000 actually underwent bariatric surgery during that time frame. But procedure patterns varied widely by state.
For example, while between roughly 9% and 10.4% of eligible patients in New Jersey, Rhode Island and Delaware opted for surgery, less than 3% did so in West Virginia, Alabama and Arkansas.
Overall, the researchers determined that the lowest in opt-in rates by region was the Midwest, where just over 4% of eligible patients underwent surgery, despite the fact that nearly 34% of Midwesterners are obese (making the region home to the highest overall obesity rates in the country).
By contrast, the highest opt-in surgery rate (nearly 8%) was seen in the Northeast region, where the overall obesity rate is lower (29%).
The findings were presented last week at a virtual meeting of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Such research is considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
“There are likely several contributing factors to the wide variation in utilization,” said Schimpke. He highlighted differences in: levels of access to medical care; beliefs and attitudes among patients and referring physicians; number of available hospitals and surgeons; and insurance coverage requirements.
Schimpke also pointed to the “negative psycho-social connotation associated with bariatric surgery among both physicians/practitioners and patients, which needs to be addressed with strategic campaigns detailing the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery.
Bariatric surgery — including sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass — offers an opportunity to reduce such risk by helping patients achieve considerable weight loss, the investigators said.
In fact, the study team noted that bariatric surgery is the standard of care for severely obese patients. Severe obesity is defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of 40, or a BMI of 35 and up alongside obesity-related complications such as diabetes.
Using insurance claims data, Schimpke and his team focused on a pool of nearly 1.8 million patients across the United States who were severely obese — and therefore eligible for bariatric surgery — in the decade beginning 2010.
Of those, roughly 100,000 actually underwent bariatric surgery during that time frame. But procedure patterns varied widely by state.
For example, while between roughly 9% and 10.4% of eligible patients in New Jersey, Rhode Island and Delaware opted for surgery, less than 3% did so in West Virginia, Alabama and Arkansas.
Overall, the researchers determined that the lowest in opt-in rates by region was the Midwest, where just over 4% of eligible patients underwent surgery, despite the fact that nearly 34% of Midwesterners are obese (making the region home to the highest overall obesity rates in the country).
By contrast, the highest opt-in surgery rate (nearly 8%) was seen in the Northeast region, where the overall obesity rate is lower (29%).
The findings were presented last week at a virtual meeting of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Such research is considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
“There are likely several contributing factors to the wide variation in utilization,” said Schimpke. He highlighted differences in: levels of access to medical care; beliefs and attitudes among patients and referring physicians; number of available hospitals and surgeons; and insurance coverage requirements.
Schimpke also pointed to the “negative psycho-social connotation associated with bariatric surgery among both physicians/practitioners and patients, which needs to be addressed with strategic campaigns detailing the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery. cyclopropyl-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)methanone manufacturer This dosage form may also support combination therapy modalities.? To date, over 400 patients have been dosed with the oral formulation of rigosertib in clinical trials.? Combination therapy of oral rigosertib with azacitidine, the standard of care in HR-MDS, has also been studied. Currently, oral rigosertib is being developed as a combination therapy together with azacitidine for patients with higher-risk MDS who require HMA therapy.? cyclopropyl-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)methanone supplier It is foreseeable that in the future, the capacity and output of bulk APIs in China will decrease, the supply-demand relationship will be balanced, and prices and profits will gradually return to a more reasonable range. The era of low prices in the past will be gone forever. Individual APIs Varieties may even lose their price competitive advantage and move abroad. cyclopropyl-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)methanone vendor This dosage form may also support combination therapy modalities.? To date, over 400 patients have been dosed with the oral formulation of rigosertib in clinical trials.? Combination therapy of oral rigosertib with azacitidine, the standard of care in HR-MDS, has also been studied. Currently, oral rigosertib is being developed as a combination therapy together with azacitidine for patients with higher-risk MDS who require HMA therapy.? cyclopropyl-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)methanone factory The American Heart Association explains that metabolic syndrome — a grouping of five different conditions — elevates the risk for such illnesses. Abdominal obesity is one such condition; the other four include high blood sugar, high triglycerides, high blood pressure and low levels of good” HDL cholesterol.
Bariatric surgery — including sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass — offers an opportunity to reduce such risk by helping patients achieve considerable weight loss, the investigators said.
In fact, the study team noted that bariatric surgery is the standard of care for severely obese patients. Severe obesity is defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of 40, or a BMI of 35 and up alongside obesity-related complications such as diabetes.
Using insurance claims data, Schimpke and his team focused on a pool of nearly 1.8 million patients across the United States who were severely obese — and therefore eligible for bariatric surgery — in the decade beginning 2010.
Of those, roughly 100,000 actually underwent bariatric surgery during that time frame. But procedure patterns varied widely by state.
For example, while between roughly 9% and 10.4% of eligible patients in New Jersey, Rhode Island and Delaware opted for surgery, less than 3% did so in West Virginia, Alabama and Arkansas.
Overall, the researchers determined that the lowest in opt-in rates by region was the Midwest, where just over 4% of eligible patients underwent surgery, despite the fact that nearly 34% of Midwesterners are obese (making the region home to the highest overall obesity rates in the country).
By contrast, the highest opt-in surgery rate (nearly 8%) was seen in the Northeast region, where the overall obesity rate is lower (29%).
The findings were presented last week at a virtual meeting of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Such research is considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
“There are likely several contributing factors to the wide variation in utilization,” said Schimpke. He highlighted differences in: levels of access to medical care; beliefs and attitudes among patients and referring physicians; number of available hospitals and surgeons; and insurance coverage requirements.
Schimpke also pointed to the “negative psycho-social connotation associated with bariatric surgery among both physicians/practitioners and patients, which needs to be addressed with strategic campaigns detailing the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery.
